Back to previous page 

  Index

Home page

 
page 24

~ Custodial Slavery ~
Letter to Craig Emerson MP

Craig, politicians have 'followed' the lead that was set as precedents from days of old, whereby 'Kings' told the 'people' that they the 'Chiefs' or 'strong men' were in control of the land and that the people were their subjects.

It was 'this' falsity promoted by force of arms that has not only enslaved the whole populace of planet earth to 'taxing' servitude to these 'heavies,' but also those 'as you' believe that as politicians you are true, as in your mind all you do is: "For the good of the Nation" (The Fatherland)

You believe that you are entitled by 'mandate' to engage in every 'act' or 'trade' or business affair of the people, and you also believe that you are 'right' as you elevate more rules and regulations day and night.

Not only this, but you destroy the 'bliss' of any who would rather place their 'penny' bet on the God of Light and Love who says: "Follow the lead of the dove and do not support any force that uses punishment for those who fail to meet their 'tax' rort that itself is a tort."

I would like to see you and others 'deliberate' for a moment as you ponder this question: "If the people of the land were told by God that they did not have to give any fiscal support to any person or department that was not of their choice, as it was contra their belief or wish to so do, how many politicians or departments would 'crash,' and how many employed in services that are only buoyed by the tax take would become void"?

When will you all see that the punishment 'factor' that forces compliance to tax extortion is wrong, and that under God's Law that is 'strong,' it brings a return 'due' upon you and you for 'permitting' these ungodly rules to exist, and for giving a 'burning twist' to any who offend your rules.

When did I 'sell' my soul into bondage and servitude and into your 'custody' to be used and abused and punished at your 'whim'? Is it not a fact that even within your own Institution 'Constitution' it says:

The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, --

If it is your 'religious observance' to control & regulate & punish others, then that is so, but do not 'impose it' upon me, nor expect me to 'follow' its way, it is 'contra' to my ideology.

I wonder 'why' your Courts took it upon themselves to imprison me for 2 months because I defied their demand and command that I 'join' their ways and pay them a fee each time I leave my home?

I wonder if again on 17 June in a Launceston Court they will again imprison me for heeding MY God and going my way peacefully as I again defy 'Caesar's "Pay me a royalty" cry.

It is a proven FACT that the System is anti-Christ and anti-God as it is punitive and extortionist. Thus I adhere to my 'religious' belief that I must NOT support 'such' or I will come to personal 'grief' under God's law.

So I ask you as a 'self-anointed' leader of the 'system' of the land: "Why is the Court and prosecution of your Institution so 'underhand' in its treatment of the peaceful people of the land? Will you 'stand' in Court as MY 'witness' on the day and to magistrate Wilson say: "This man is to go free as he is not in contravention of our Constitution, nor does he defy HIS God"?

It is the time for all politicians to see that neither you nor the Institution you serve are the 'custodians' of the people. God is their Father & Mother. Try and this see and set your own souls free.

'Religious freedom' or religious 'observance' does not imply the 'right' to belong to a religious 'order' or 'denomination,' for that is but custodial enslavement to another form of Institution with its 'controlling' rituals. For the rituals of religions are but its 'officers' performing 'acts' to attract 'paying' customers.

True religion stripped of rituals and Institutions is the observance to and obedience to the living Word of God, and that means living it in ones daily deeds or 'works' in accordance with that Word: "Walk in peace and do not disturb the peace of the land, do not steal from or abuse or control any other. Be merciful and compassionate and forgiving towards any that offend thee and My face you will see. Fail ME and the Devil will own thee."

page 25

~ The game of 'Cricket' ~

Since time 'immemorial' God did say that "Peace & love & forgiveness" was to be the way, and that Christ would expose all thieves who had sullied their inner 'rose.'

Far in the past, the 'arrogant' decided to impose their 'will' upon other children of God and to this do, and at the same time hide their intent to extort, they did a dark 'foul' game of 'Cricket' invent. For Cricket is a game of 'integrity,' but the new 'political' one was one with a 'foul' hidden intent.

Hoping that it would enable them to 'seemingly' wisely and justly steal from others and, leave a painful 'weal' across the back of any who tried to avoid their 'thievery & control' attack they backed by coercive force.

They also saw not the hidden 'force' telepathically 'seducing' their minds from the Dark, for ITS aim was to keep man totally 'enslaved' to perpetual toil, or be 'confined' if he was not prepared to 'slave' for the Dark one.

To do this IT inspired the 'beastly' punitive Institution, so that IT could 'steal' up to 80% of man's lifetime earnings via ITS rules & regulations imposed 'legitimately' in ignorant man's eyes.

But what these thieves inspired by darkness could not see was that they were 'stumped' before bowling their first 'ball,' and thus their 'edifice' of rules they raised to control were all to be exposed as wrong and false in God's eyes and in the eyes of the 'latter year' wise.

For as the 'dark' invader laid HIS 'plan' to ensnare all via the mind of supposedly good men and good legislators, the Light of God gave a base line 'rule' that would nullify all the 'subsequent' rules raised by Governments & Councils.

For all 'rules' that use force for punishment are a Dark imposition through man upon man, and all such rules defy God and God's great plan.

The 'primary' tool of the 'Dark' game was the initial raising of an Edict called "The Preamble," within which the 'first' falsity and imposition of control was placed and enforced with a mace. Being words to the effect of -

WHEREAS the people of - - - - humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:

The falsity being that the 'have agreed to unite' was itself an imposition, and was neither agreed to by the 'present' population of that day nor by others entering the flesh of this world in later days. The 'preamble' was 'simply' accepted as it had been 'given' by a King or his men and assumed to be good.

It was 'bad,' for within the Constitutional 'terminology' man 'ceded' away his body, mind, and soul and personal rights and enslaved himself to servitude and suffering, and the more he 'gave' or paid the system, the more the Serpent's sting was imposed by 'added' taxation and greater punishment.

The 'primary' block of the Light that would 'show' itself as right at the end time was the inclusion of the 'Right' to ones 'Religious freedom,'* placed within the Constitution itself. ('Religious freedom,'* exposed in the following letter to Judge Crawford.)

It is now I to expose a 'fuller' and deeper meaning to ones 'Fundamental Right,' as well as to the word 'Religion' and its use and 'usefulness' to any true believer in God, and to any true who are presently 'bound' as an employee by any System of Government. If they can see the error of their 'judging' ways, then they can 'change' their way before the last day.

page 26

~ Judge Crawford  ~
- Supreme Court of Tasmania.

Reference: Constitution - "Error in Fact & Law."

Dear Judge Crawford, it has come to my attention that a 'judgement' made by you was incorrect under your own Institutional 'Articles of Association,' namely the Constitution of both the Federal and Tasmanian Constitutional 'Acts.'

Presumably the 'actual' wording within the Constitution precludes any subsequent 'rule' that is legislated by men that is in 'variance' to the fundamental 'view' of the Constitution, and as such, any ruling by you that 'defies' the Acts within the Constitution is error.

It was only recently that my mind inspired by our God of Light above 'said' to me that I would 'find' something in the Australian Constitution to assist you to see your error, and if you were a man of 'Honour,' you would do the right thing before God and man and withdraw the 'sting' imposed upon me.

It is all a matter of belief, and if I can 'prove' unto you that I do abide in my belief, then this primary fact backed by the Constitutional Right of those living within the 'jurisdiction' of your Institution would assist you in 'approval' of my appeal.

This would be on the grounds that as in your opinion I am a 'subject of' and 'in the jurisdiction of' State rules, that under the 'requirements' of the Constitution I have proven my belief, and as I do follow it conscientiously, that I am free to follow my 'religious' belief and conscience as is 'allowed' every citizen on the land by 'said' Constitution.

I give here the Tasmanian 'reference - followed by the Federal reference.

Constitution Act 1934 (Tas)

This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians.

Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 116
Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion

The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

Dictionary: Religion = 'A system of belief in the worship of a supernatural power or God.' or
The recognition by man of a superhuman power entitled to obedience, reverence, and worship.

My belief is this: - - - That God's Code of Conduct is what it is, being God's statement of fact.

I believe that the Statement of God is that I or 'we' must walk in peace and be forgiving & merciful and, - - - that we must not in any way condone or support or be a 'party to' any 'regime' or Institution that condones punishment or war, or that 'relies on' the sword or gun to enforce, thus my belief is that I must walk 'apart' from supporting any such Institution.

I believe that I should and do support the community and its endeavours, but not be complicit to any 'punitive' role by community members, be they mandated to so be due to their 'duty' or otherwise.

It is also my belief that I must show God and man that I do walk 'separately' and thus I neither use 'retributionary' force nor do I rely on 'State' policing forces for protection against any 'perceived' enemy, for I perceive no man as my enemy, and any that abuse me I forgive and seek no recompense.

Thus as my 'religion' is my belief "in a supernatural power, God." - - - - and as I believe that God has an 'expectancy' of me to show HIM my belief by living it each day, I am TRUE to that belief, and I conscientiously exercise my God given right to so be. (True to my belief.)

I do have a fundamental belief that all men are born 'free' in that they have a God given Right to heed their God of Light. This 'view' was held in disdain by you when I appealed against a lower Court decision, and my 'case' was in fact held in 'derision' by some.

I also have a fundamental belief that all men are born 'free' in that they have a God given Right to heed their God of Light, even if 'prior to' or 'subsequent to' their birth there was an 'Institution' in place with its own rules that might conflict with the 'ideals' of the newly born.

It is also my belief that I am entitled by God to follow and practise my belief. If any man 'legislates' any 'rule' or decree that is in 'opposition' to my belief, then so be it.

If he by 'force of arms' imposes his punitive 'belief' upon me for non compliance to his belief, then the very Devil's face he will see. So be it. For that is his 'freedom of choice' as his 'belief' defies God's Code of Conduct.

I believe that if any citizens believe that they must follow God and comply with God's Code of conduct "Walk in peace and respect all," and comply with God's commandment "Only love one another and do not disturb the peace," then 'that' citizen is entitled to walk 'unharmed' by said 'officers' of the State, and not be 'berated' or coerced or intimidated or forced into fiscally or otherwise 'supporting' the State Institution that is operating in a non-Christian manner that is totally 'contra' God's Code & Command, as it is 'extortionist, invasive, punitive, destructive, violent and dictatorial.'

I have 'shown' the Court of man that my automobile is 'marked' with a 'sign' number denoting that I did 'register' my vote for God and my belief in God's requirement of me, and thus carry no 'man' number plate, as my automobile is marked:

< www.the-testament-of-truth.com >

And I 'insure' myself with God as I believe that God is my 'protector,' not man, and I show the Institution which you serve that I am merely following my beliefs as 'granted' unto all 'men' by God as well as 'visible' within the Constitution that is the 'Articles of Association' of the Institution you presently serve.

Thus as you are 'charged' with upholding this Constitution that precedes and supersedes any 'subsequent' legislation, I believe that you are 'entitled' to make a fresh 'ruling' on my case and thus show man and God that: - - - in your considered opinion 'as' I am a proven man of peace who conscientiously follows his belief, that I am free to go my way unhindered.

It is 'nice' to see that the 'person' who made the 'original' reference to 'religious rights' in the Constitution did have a 'Godly' view that people should be 'free' to follow their 'star.'

It is just that 'man' sees not the full implications of the wording 'religious freedom,' probably as there are no true 'believers' today as all 'talk' of Light and love etc, but the reality is that humankind is 'less' than loving and merciful, and thus the 'followers' of every known religion today are actually all non-believers in the 'star' they by 'mouth' profess to follow.

This but due to their ignorance of the real truth our God does bring to earth today by my pen as it 'attempts' to bring sanity into this 'sad' place.

I trust that you will 'review' your judgement of my 'case' as the 'System' again wields a mace against God's messenger and I face Magistrate Wilson soon in a Launceston Court, and I would not have it that he 'errs' again in God's eyes, for as I see it, every police 'officer' and judiciary 'person' is exceeding their own 'Constitutional' mandate, and they are also in defiance of God's Command and Code of Conduct requirement.

Let it here now be seen and known that every 'judiciary' has a mandate to 'operate' that is built on falsity, and is only supported by force of arms that are the Devil's 'charms.'

This letter to Judge Crawford is the 'culmination' of the Court proceedings and Judgement of man by God found in "The Judgement Papers" document on this web site.

page 27

~ Contradictions ~

I write this hoping that those employed as State 'officers' and the judiciary can set themselves free from the systems of iniquity, for if they believe that it is wrong for the public to commit crimes against others, - - - and thus 'righteous' on their part to enforce punishment for and on behalf of the people via the Institution, then they should be able to see that this punishment itself is a CRIME.

If the Institution enacts rules enforced by 'forceful' means (The law), then it is condoning the use of criminal activities by ITS serving officers as they are the ones mandated by rules to intrude, detain, kidnap, steal, seize, destroy, punish, pillage, hold hostage, and kill.

So if you are the policing 'officer' or the magistrate or judge, then you must try and see that your acts are a 'conspiracy' against your own soul, and that you are 'selling' yourself and others into bondage to the Dark Sovereign Power for a 'mercenary' wage.

Please now listen to this Sage, for no man stands above God's Law and, - - - what you do for the Institutional government and, - - - for and on behalf of the people in the community, - - - are daily 'offensive' acts that all defy your Creator and, - - - you will be 'judged' by the Dark Sovereign Power for your iniquities and, - - - believe you me, you will be 'judged' as you judged, and great suffering as your due is already weighing down the 'balance' on God's 'Scales of Justice' against you.

God says: "Do not disturb the peace of the land."
Institutional officers do 'Disturb the peace of the land' in a manner underhand.

If you have a religious 'belief,' then that belief is your ideology, being your philosophy, doctrine, opinion, and tenets, being your 'creed, faith, and dogma.'

Every person has a 'belief' in something, even the false belief that it is 'righteous' to set aside ones "Love & peace unto all" belief for a 'moment' as you punish another and cause them grief.

If you have been deceived through ignorance in society of this falsity, then you need to now implement change before the whole planet does derange, for God is now to punish all non-believers in HIS Holy Word, being any that verbally or physically wielded a 'sword' in action against any other. That includes the police & judiciary whilst they perform their false duty.

For our God is entitled to obedience, reverence, and worship, and to 'worship' God you need to ensure that you never 'stray' from the "Peace unto all" Command of the day. A 'mandate' by man to use force or to detain or punish is a contradiction that is Treason against the State of Heaven and punishable by spiritual death.

It is a 'treasonable' offence in God's eyes to enact 'rules' that force others into a way of living that is contra to their religious belief. It is also a treasonable offence against the sovereignty of an individual to use the threat of fine and punishment as the coercive means whereby they through fear are forced into compliance with said rules.

All must now heed me or be eternally bound in the afterlife.

page 28

~ Freedom or Slavery ~
The Constitution & man's Court v/s Truth

Ever since man learnt to read and write he* sought a 'legitimate' way to control others and use their 'labours' to fund his own greed needs. In order to do this he* man inspired by the Dark Sovereign Power (Devil) did invoke a 'spell-binding' document called 'The Constitution,' within which were 'honeyed' words to entrap and enslave all men living within the 'boundaries' of the land that he* controlled by force of arms.

Note: he* - In this instance being any person controlled telepathically by the dark power through his negative emotions of greed or pride or vanity. Thus the 'he' is in fact also meaning: He the Dark Sovereign Power. For it always was and is that 'force' seeking to enslave mankind and force them into servitude to its extortionist & punitive ways so that it could under its one Law punish them for their arrogance is 'assuming' that they were 'as' mighty as it.

So this 'force' via the mind of man 'wrote' a document that would 'bind' any person who 'foolishly' believed that it the document was 'legal' and good and binding and, - - - to be 'followed' by them and 'funded' and supported by them. None seeing that its 'content' was at 'variance to' God's Code of Conduct and Commandment unto mankind.

And this 'force' also via the mind of vain legislators did write 'contradictory' rules that forced the enforcers being the police and judiciary to themselves contravene the 'civil' conduct of man and their God during the course of their 'duty,' as they had to 'intrude, arrest, detain, abuse, punish, kidnap, hold hostage in jails, and even kill those that they were told by the 'book of rules' were 'offenders.'

Thus due to all the 'people of the land' having a supportive 'part' in these anti-God activities, all were and yet are bound to 'jointly' receive a painful spiritual comeback that 'appears' on their personal 'doorstep' via other ignorant people operating as thieves, murderers, and perpetrating domestic violence etc, all being 'payback' from the Dark Sovereign Power via the arrogant.

This paper gives added explanation to the 'Slave Citizen' document to assist you to see iniquity and thus enable you to set yourself free, for any continuing support of man's false way is what leads you to the lair of HE the Dark Sovereign Power on a later day.

The following (1 to 3) being the 'decree' of a Queen or King or Chief or political leader is a 'sample' of 'a' Constitutional document of man, and shows how 'he' the Dark Sovereign Power (Devil) dictates words via the mind of men that bind any person who 'listens' to them or, who through fear or coercion is forced to comply with them due to the ignorance of the 'officers' of the Institution who receive a 'mercenary' wage to enforce it the false Constitution of man.

SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE AND SUPREMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION

Sovereignty of the people

Item 1 - All sovereign authority belongs to the people of - - - and may be exercised only in accordance with the Constitution. The people shall exercise their sovereign power either directly or through their democratically elected representatives.

Note: As you can see from the above, it is stated that the people hold sovereignty, and that the 'citizen' is acting in accordance with the Constitution when they 'exercise' this sovereignty.

As you all know, the Institution of government 'permits' no person within its jurisdiction to be 'free' of its never-ending funding demands, nor of its punitive measures for non-compliance.

Thus I 'ask,' what is meant by 'exercising ones sovereign right'? For in my opinion it is my 'sovereign' right to not comply with any 'taxing' pecuniary demands made upon me by any 'legislation' that I see as 'noxious' and pure extortion.

Neither do I need to be 'punished' if I am merely exercising my sovereign right to not condone or support or fund any Institution that I perceive as 'ungodly' in its way. It follows that any punitive measures taken against me for any actions or non actions by the judiciary are totally 'out of order' and are arrogant disorder by servants of 'said' Institution.

The 'manner' of control and enslavement over the populace continues on with 'content' such as:

Item 2 - The sovereign authority of the people is allocated separately among –

(a) The Legislature, to whom the people entrust the legislative authority of the - - - to be exercised in accordance with - - - and:

(b) The Executive, to whom the people entrust the executive authority of the - - - to be exercised in accordance with - - - and:

(c) The Judiciary and other independent and impartial tribunals, to whom the people entrust the judicial authority of the - - - to be exercised in accordance with -

page 29

Note: The above 'a - b - c' all contradict the stated 'sovereignty' of the people, and try to abrogate their simple right to the freedom of 'self-rule,' and are words used to hand over ones 'being' into slavery to the various Institutional 'departments' listed above.

Supremacy of the Constitution.

Item 3 - The Nation called - - - is founded on the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law and shall be governed in accordance with the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law and binds all authorities and persons throughout the land, and the validity, legality or procedure of enactment or promulgation of this Constitution is not subject to challenge by or before any court, organ or agency of the state.

Note: As you can see from this section '3,' any who 'join' into any 'partnership' with the Institution of man are bound by the dictates of the 'officers' of the Institution, and to any rules raised up in subsequent years that are forceful and have punitive 'law' attachments.

None of the serving 'officers' nor the public are seeing their God given 'entitlement' to walk 'apart' from the 'ways' and beliefs of the Institution, that is also contained within the basic 'principles' of the Constitution of man, and all have been doing the wrong thing as they 'forgot' this primary basic 'foundation stone' upon which the Constitution of man was formed, being:

"The sovereign right of each to follow ones belief, ones religious belief, ones conscience."

The following is also contained within the Australian Constitution that is similar to that of many other nations, and I refer to its clause:

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 116
Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion

The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion,

Constitution Act 1934 (Tasmania)

This document includes a legal guarantee of the religious liberty and equality of Tasmanians.

Every citizen is guaranteed freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion under Section 46(1) of this Act.

What the above is actually saying is that: A person is free to follow the Code of Conduct as set down by his God and his own conscience and, that no 'law' can be made that will 'force' any into following the 'belief' (Ideology) of any other.

Thus the 'bad' and evil 'belief' in punishment, - - - that is the 'apparent' belief of every 'supporter' of the Institution that uses punishment and, - - - it is also the evil 'belief' of serving officers of the judiciary, - - - is not required to be 'condoned, supported, or followed' by those with a differing belief.

It is obvious to me that all that support and 'follow' the System of man and, - - - all that 'comply' with the Constitution of man are those with the 'punitive & unforgiving' belief, and that belief is contra my 'peaceful & forgiving' belief.

It is apparent that the 'legislators' who enact rules permitting extortion, seizure, punishment, killing etc, are themselves living their evil 'belief,' but neither they nor the serving judiciary see that the imposition of its 'way' upon others that causes great loss and suffering returns to them personally on another GOD appointed and GOD 'dictated' day.

These 'officers' of the Institution believe that they are above their own 'rules' and punitive law as well as above God's law. Foolish man, he sees not 'how' the Dark Sovereign Power has blinded him and trapped him.

I am 'simply' stating that man has found himself in a 'pickle' of contradictions and, - - - that due to the 'permission' granted in the Constitution above, man is in fact entitled to do whatever he is inspired to, be it good or bad without being controlled by or punished by other men, and this is 'validated' by the Constitution as well as by God via this pen.

Let me here 'reiterate' that God has but one LAW, and that all men are 'subject to' that ONE Law. Therefore if you believe in the 'punitive & grieve' way, then your future is 'paved' that way by God under the 'dark & negative & punitive' retributive aspect of God's law "As you do is done unto you."

If you believe in 'peace & love' then that too is subject to God's ONE Law and your future is paved with peace & love. Heed me, for I am God's dove.

page 30

~ The 'great' deception ~

The Dark Sovereign Power is the 'ultimate' Power, the ultimate Judge, the ultimate controller, the ultimate enslaver and, - - - HE deceives all that would HIM be, or those that try to 'as' mighty as HIM be.

And any vain man that 'raised up' edicts that would control the freedom of other men are now exposed as 'fools' by this God's pen. For they 'succumbed' to the 'ultimate' bad 'joke' that was 'played' upon them by HE the GIANT who now will them all with a 'blunt' stick poke.

For they presumed that the freedom of others they could steal and, upon their 'backs' leave a punishment 'weal,' and none of these 'legislators' nor their 'officious' men could see their foolishness that is now laid 'open.'

For by imposing HIS enslavement upon the 'lost' using never-ending 'rules' enacted, and by the initial 'imposition' of the 'decrees' such as:

(a) The Legislature, to whom the people entrust the legislative authority of the - - - and:
(b) The Executive, to whom
the people entrust the executive authority of the - - - and:
(c) The Judiciary, to whom
the people entrust the judicial authority of the - - - to -

The 'legislators' took away the sovereign right of man to be free and live 'under' his own God, whatever it was perceived by man to be, and - - - by taking the sovereign right of man away from himself to by the 'legislators' be spoken for, and controlled by others, the legislators must now for their iniquities pay, and under God's one Law they will all* suffer and be 'controlled & punished' for many a long day.

For the imposition of the 'control' by others as 'exercised' within clauses (a - b - c) was pure iniquity and, - - - it was also a very bad 'joke' to enslave every person on the land and them with a 'blunt stick' poke if they did not 'kow-tow' to the rules that upon them the legislators and prison officials did 'shower.'

Foolish man, try and see that none of you 'as' God be, and none of you can see that God is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient and does all see. Yes, your 'punishment to be' you all deserve, for you all did away from the Holy Word swerve.

Democracy, It is the 'universal right' to have God as ones 'head of house,' and this means that one conforms to the Code of Conduct of God, not man.

Note: all* - also includes those now residing in spirit realms that 'passed-over' during the past 'millennia's.'

page 31

~ Judicial 'error' and anarchy ~

There is a 'prima facie' fact that has been either 'unseen' or 'overridden' by precedent by the 'upholders' of said Constitution namely, the judiciary, the politicians, and their 'armed forces.'

This fact is the truth that any 'The Constitution' of any Institution applies solely to those persons whom either 'support or fund or belong to' said Institution. For its 'The Constitution' is its guide and legality of operational control over those belonging to the Institution.

Thus it 'follows' that any rule or regulation or punishment 'factor' written as 'law' within any Constitution or other 'documents' pertaining to governance does not apply to any person outside the Institution and, - - - neither does it apply to any person 'stated' within said Constitution who is 'one' who is free to follow their own conscience or religious belief, if that 'clause' is contained within the Constitution.

Thus it follows that any political or armed force or judiciary who have in the past or yet do in the present, punish by fine or abuse or incarceration any of 'such' outsiders, have operated as 'mercenary anarchists' and, - - - have operated not only 'outside' the stated parameters of their own Institutional Constitution, but have also contravened God's Code of Conduct as stated within God's Constitution that is referred to at the end of this paper.

Thus it is 'obvious' to God and I that the 'law of the jungle' is being applied by the judiciary of every land in a manner very 'underhand.' Especially as it results in every judicial 'abuser'* incurring a very heavy 'penalty' from God under God's ONE Law. "As you do is done unto you."

Note: judicial 'abuser'* - Any and every punitive ' sentence' passed by any person be they the man in the street or any mandated Judge is an abuse perpetrated by one against humanity. (God's children.)

Man needs to see that even though he 'believes' he has a 'legal' mandate to abuse others, he is never in a 'free' state whereby he is above the law of God.

As it is my sacred duty to God and man to now elevate the consciousness of man with wisdom emanating from their Creator, I would like to show by example the 'meanness' of the nature of the 'beast' that controls you all.

You all 'love' someone, and you would all 'do' all you could to help those that you love. Why then do you 'heed' the 'call' of the beast in your daily 'deeds' and 'happily' confine & constrict & abuse your fellow man?

It is because of the mental control over your mind from within via your inner sin that enables the 'mean' one to give you a justifiable reason to so do and, - - - at the same time blinds you to your iniquity and, - - - to what HE to you will later do.

I give here a few 'easy' to see instances where by precedent 'set,' the judiciary and 'officers' of political Institutions are being very dark and 'unobservant' of the evil they perpetrate in the name of the people.

1 - If an 'overseas' fisherman appears over the horizon and fishes within the national fishing ground 'bounds' set by legislation, and that legislation is itself receiving its 'authority and legality and mandate' from the Constitution of the Institution, then as the 'intruder' is not a 'party member' of said Institution, he is not 'bound' by its legislated rules.

It 'follows' that any punitive action of detainment or punishment or destruction of his fishing vessel is itself an 'act' in defiance of God and, - - - it is not 'legal' within the Constitution either, as the Constitution and its 'rule' states that any person who 'believes' that they have the right to fish anywhere may so do and, - - - as said, no man is 'bound' to adhere to the rules of others unless he has agreed to 'belong' to their Institution, and agreed to abide in the "Constitution" of said Institution.

2 - If an 'overseas' visitor who is seeking 'refuge' enters within the national 'boundaries' of a landmass set by legislation, and that legislation is itself receiving its 'authority and legality and mandate' from the Constitution of the Institution, then as the visitor named by Institutions an 'intruder' is not a 'party member' of said Institution, then he is not 'bound' by its legislated rules.

It 'follows' that any punitive action of detainment or fine or punishment is itself an 'act' in defiance of God and it is not 'legal' within the Constitution either, as the Constitution and its 'rule' implies that any person who 'believes' that they have the right to seek refuge anywhere may so do and, - - - as said, no man is 'bound' to adhere to the rules of others unless he has agreed to 'belong' to their Institution, and agreed to abide in the "Constitution' of said Institution and, - - - the religious liberty given unto all within the Constitution precludes them from being 'bound' legally and punishable by the Institution.

In both of the above instances man believes that his 'right' of ownership of land and sea overrides his 'observance' to his own Constitutional 'code' as well as the Code of Conduct set by God. Pure folly, and the judiciary had 'better' now look to their deeds, as God is to separate the 'wheat' from the weeds.

It is the time to now see that the present 'way' of man is pure 'bastardry' and all that continue on within its punitive 'law' or 'rule' will very soon find themselves not only 'locked out' of Heaven, but lost in a very dark and dreary and cold place inhabited by demons with horrible faces and no 'social' graces, and they most certainly have no 'moral' code of conduct. Their conduct Code enforced mentally upon them by the 'deceiver' states:

"Go your way causing as much noise and pain and suffering to all you meet, and with all your might you must intrude and sweep the other off their feet, because they all deserve it as all are evil and all did defy their Creator the Light."

page 32

~ The ground rule ~

Man raised up a 'document' he called "The Constitution" that itself was the 'ground rule' legitimising him 'man' to 'enact' subsequent rules that 'he' man wished to in order to gain control over God's children and, - - - to punish them if they defaulted in any way.

These 'rules' also 'legitimised' man's use of dark 'force of arms' to give him the 'powerful' authority needed to enforce his dictates. But what he 'vain' man did not see was the 'ground rule' of God that said:

"There is a 'bad' apple on the tree, and if you use its dark power then you will be bound by ME the Dark Sovereign Power that is self-mandated to punish thee, for within MY one Law I have the Supreme Power and Supreme Sovereignty to punish thee."

And what arrogant man also did not see was the power of the deceit that flowed forth from that 'bad' apple on the tree, for IT said:

" Heed not the wisdom of the Light, for only if you can see MY dark will you be able to discern good from evil, and only when you can see evil will you be able to destroy it for ME."

And what arrogant man could also not see was that 'once' he strayed from the wisdom of the Light and 'supped' on the Dark's Might, that he was then enslaved to ITS punitive way and, - - - thus become 'punishable' by IT under ITS one law:

"As you do is done unto you."

Pain for pain. Punishment for punishment. Suffering for suffering,
for that is your DUE for being to MY Light untrue.

Thus the 'Constitution' of man is the ultimate slave document that binds and enslaves all that 'participate' and are a 'party to' its upkeep and ways and, - - - it binds them to the Dark Sovereign Power who 'controls' and ultimately destroys all that follow HIS punitive decrees.

A 'slave' is a 'captive' dominated by another, and is one being forced to work for another and, - - - is one being forced to carry out deeds that contravene God's Command, being God's Code of Conduct. Thus a slave is a person being forced further away from the Light of God and into deeper suffering through bondage and servitude to darkness.

The Constitution is the 'foundation' stone upon which the Institution stands, and it is the Constitution that dupes the 'officers' of the Institution that it (the Constitution) serves, and its 'deception' is so great that none of them can see that it is a 'rogue' document and, - - - that their assumed authority is itself an illegitimate authority based solely on 'force of arms' - - - the gun.

Man of 'today' has been born into slavery, and Planet Earth is a GIANT slave camp that has 'existed' since time on earth began, and it is only now that 'we' of the Light can set ourselves free from eternal bondage by heeding the wisdom of God that will help all to see.

For it was through greed & vanity and the 'fiscal' need to control others so as to meet the demands of the 'superiors, that the political legislators have 'bastardised' and contaminated the basic 'principle' of their own Constitution, and they have also assumed 'ownership' of God's children.

This 'anarchy,' falsity and iniquity is now exposed by the Light of God that shines through me, and it says: "You have the freedom of choice to remain enslaved in perpetuity or to set yourselves free."

You are now free to only support the welfare system and public works department needs of your communities, and not fund punitive or controlling forces. This is not only your God given right, but if you have clarity of sight then you will see that you also have this right within the 'principles' of the Constitution that presently 'governs' most of thee.

You need to "Break away from any personal dark deeds."
You need to "Break away from supporting any
punitive system of man."
You need to "Break away from being an
'enforcer' for any Institution of man."
Any 'dark' deed is inspired from Hell, and is in defiance of God's
Code of Conduct.

page 33

~ Notes ~

Irrespective of any Constitution raised by man, God states that every person has the God given right to not only have a belief, but they are entitled by God to live that belief in their daily deeds. All are 'answerable' to God, not man.

Religious 'freedom' is not the 'freedom' to belong to any particular religious Institution, it is the freedom to conduct yourself in accordance with the laid down Commandment and Code of Conduct of the ONE God that inspired every known 'religious' order. He said: "Walk in peace & love one another, and be merciful & compassionate & forgiving." HE did not tell us to punish or abuse or destroy.

~~~

Any person, who legislated any 'acts' or rules that attempt to, or do, extort money by taxation or licence fee, or control others, and thus by 'said' rules force others into not only 'compliance,' but also by said compliance, having to contravene God's Code of Conduct, is themselves an 'anarchist.' (For compliance with negative acts is supporting their usage)

Any person 'mandated' or otherwise who 'polices' and thus assists said Institutional legislators by forcing others to defy their God through complying to 'contra' God's policies is a scoundrel.

Any person 'mandated' or otherwise who 'polices' and thus assists said Institutional legislators by forcing others to comply to these 'rules' using fine or punishment to intimidate or coerce is also a terrorist waging war against God's children, as they 'defy' their own Constitution and their own conscience for a 'mercenary' wage. (E.g. police & judiciary)

It is the false belief of the police & judiciary that 'citizens' must comply with the belief of the legislators and the decrees of politicians or kings or chiefs. The legislator believes that he has the 'divine' right to impose rules & regulations & taxing schemes upon the public. He does not.

His 'office & mandate' were imposed upon the community using force of arms (weapons) in the first instance, thus he has no 'right' to impose his demands. Neither do the police & judiciary have any 'right' to enforce them.

The policing force also believe that they can use 'force of arms' legitimately to enforce their belief, being their supposed right to use force and force others into compliance. This is FALSE & WRONG. All err in God's eyes.

I believe that God is the sovereign power, not man's Institution.
I
believe that God must be obeyed, not man's Institution.
AND
if there is a
'conflict' of interest, then I obey GOD the Light.

I live the way I do because I believe that I must OBEY and SUBMIT to the 'will' of God - my God of the Light, and SHE tells me to go in peace, and not be a 'party' in any way with others who follow the GOD of DEATH who controls & punishes & destroys, or HE will also destroy me.

Though I live in a land alongside those others who do fight and steal taxes and kill their enemies, I do not, I remain peaceful. Thus my automobile is 'unnumbered' by their 'Institutional' mark and I pay no monies to the 'upkeep' of their 'punitive' Institution by tax or licence fee, as I cannot support its punitive ways. But I daily do help those trapped within its confines with my wisdom and good counsel, and I assist my community in every way I can, be it financially or otherwise.

page 34

~ The Law of the Jungle ~

The Law of the Jungle is when or 'where' the 'judge' of the day metes out whatever punishment he is inspired to at a 'particular' moment and, - - - the 'judge & executioner' is the one condemning the 'accused' to a 'particular' punishment and, - - - the Law of the Jungle is in action in the Court of man as he 'usurps' his own Constitutional Mandate each day.

The Law of the Jungle is: "I the most powerful one will now punish or destroy you the lesser one who deserves to be punished by ME." None it seems can see that the use of 'overbearing' force of arms is not a God of Light given right, and its use by any deserves 'attrition' from the Dark Sovereign Power under God's ONE Law.

Man must try and see that the Law of the Jungle is in fact the 'retributive arm' of the Dark Sovereign Power in action either through the legislated rules of man's institutions or, - - - through the individual mind of a person 'controlled' direct from the Dark and, - - - either of these 'parties' is 'justified' by IT the Dark to perpetrate an evil deed.

The Law of the Jungle is in operation when 'one' of the parties has the 'upper' hand due to them being more powerful or due to their 'forces' being greater or, due to one bearing 'arms' that enable them to control the situation and do whatever they are inspired to in a manner that is contrary to God's Code of Conduct: "Peace & love & mercy & forgiveness."

The Law of the Jungle is in operation every time any punitive deed is perpetrated by any other than God, thus every 'act' condoning retribution is an 'act' in defiance of God.

Ignorant man 'believes' that if he is 'adhering' to punishment 'categorised' within a 'book of rules' that was 'raised up' by a 'legal' Institution, that the 'execution' of the punishment is thus legal, and is no longer 'classified' as 'The Law of the Jungle.'

In fact, the 'Law of the Jungle' in action is any 'retributive' action that causes pain or suffering or loss to be imposed by one upon another and, - - - it is a direct contravention